1. Evaluate reorder investment for SKU001
| SKU | Warehouse | On Hand | Reorder Point | Cost |
| 001 | A | 50 | 30 | $100 |
| 002 | B | 20 | 25 | $250 |
| 003 | A | 100 | 40 | $50 |
| 004 | C | 15 | 20 | $150 |
| 005 | B | 80 | 50 | $75 |
=-4000 + NPV(9%, 1200, 1200, 1200, 1200)
Result: -$112.11
Reordering 40 more SKU001 units costs $4,000 upfront but avoids $1,200/year in stockout losses for 4 years. At a 9% discount rate, the discounted benefits ($3,887.90) don't cover the cost—NPV is negative, so the reorder is not justified financially.
2. Evaluate warehouse management system ROI
| SKU | Warehouse | On Hand | Reorder Point | Cost |
| 001 | A | 50 | 30 | $100 |
| 002 | B | 20 | 25 | $250 |
| 003 | A | 100 | 40 | $50 |
| 004 | C | 15 | 20 | $150 |
| 005 | B | 80 | 50 | $75 |
=-12000 + NPV(10%, 3000, 4000, 4500, 5000)
Result: $827.93
Implementing a $12,000 warehouse management system generates growing annual savings: $3,000 labor savings in year 1, $4,000 from reduced waste in year 2, climbing to $5,000 by year 4. With a 10% discount rate, the discounted benefits ($12,827.93) exceed cost by $827.93—positive NPV means the investment should be approved.
3. Compare warehouse consolidation scenario
| SKU | Warehouse | On Hand | Reorder Point | Cost |
| 001 | A | 50 | 30 | $100 |
| 002 | B | 20 | 25 | $250 |
| 003 | A | 100 | 40 | $50 |
| 004 | C | 15 | 20 | $150 |
| 005 | B | 80 | 50 | $75 |
=-8000 + NPV(8%, 2500, 3000, 3500, 4000)
Result: $2,605.28
Consolidating WarehouseB and WarehouseC into one location costs $8,000 upfront but saves $2,500 in year 1 (reduced staffing), increasing to $4,000 annually as efficiencies compound. The 8% discount rate reflects operational risk. Positive NPV of $2,605.28 indicates consolidation creates substantial value.