1. Analyze maintenance cost distribution
| Vehicle | Cost |
| Car A | 150 |
| Car A | 180 |
| Car A | 165 |
| Car B | 145 |
| Car B | 220 |
| Car B | 155 |
| Car C | 175 |
| Car C | 195 |
| Car C | 160 |
=KURT(150, 180, 165, 145, 220, 155, 175, 195, 160)
Result: 0.86
The nine maintenance costs range from 145 to 220. Kurtosis of 0.86 (positive) indicates slightly heavier tails, meaning prices occasionally spike to extremes beyond a normal distribution, signaling unpredictable budget swings.
2. Evaluate spread in service intervals
| Interval (miles) |
| 15000 |
| 15000 |
| 16000 |
| 14000 |
| 15000 |
| 15000 |
=KURT(15000, 15000, 16000, 14000, 15000, 15000)
Result: -0.31
Service intervals cluster tightly around 15,000 miles (range 14k–16k). Negative kurtosis (–0.31) indicates a platykurtic distribution—narrow spread with no extreme outliers, suggesting highly predictable maintenance scheduling.
3. Assess odometer variation at service time
| Odometer at Service |
| 15000 |
| 30000 |
| 45000 |
| 12000 |
| 28000 |
| 42000 |
| 18000 |
| 33000 |
| 48000 |
=KURT(15000, 30000, 45000, 12000, 28000, 42000, 18000, 33000, 48000)
Result: -0.42
The nine odometer readings are fairly evenly spaced from 12,000 to 48,000 miles. Negative kurtosis (–0.42) confirms a platykurtic distribution—fleet vehicles accumulate mileage uniformly without clustering at extremes.